Antimony(V) Adsorption by Variable-Charge Minerals
ER-1741
Objective
Antimony (Sb) is a co-contaminant with lead (Pb) in shooting range soils at Department of Defense (DoD) installations throughout the United States. The in situ immobilization of Pb in shooting range soils can be accomplished through the application of phosphate (PO4); however, the impact of this treatment on the mobility and bioaccessibility of Sb is unknown. Further, the ability to predict Sb fate and behavior in contaminated soils, or as influenced by treatment technologies, has not been suitably developed. In soil, Sb commonly exists in the Sb(V) oxidation state as the hydroxyanion Sb(OH)6-. This anionic species is derived through the dissociation of an antimonic acid (Sb(OH)5, a weak acid). As such, the principal mechanisms of retention in soils are anion exchange (weak adsorption) and ligand exchange (strong adsorption) by variable-charge soil minerals, such as iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) oxyhydroxides. Available research findings suggest that Sb(V) is associated with Fe oxyhydroxides in soils and that PO4 can enhance Sb(V) mobility and presumably bioaccessibility. This project seeks to address the following hypotheses: (1) the adsorption characteristics of Sb(V) by hydrous Fe and Al oxyhydroxides will establish the mechanisms and quantitative parameters needed to assess treatment strategies and predict bioaccessibility; (2) PO4 and sulfate (SO4) will compete with Sb(V) for adsorption sites on reactive soil minerals; the competitive effect will differ with competing ligand, initial saturation of the surfaces, and pH; and (3) chemical speciation models that employ surface complexation models (SCM) may be used to determine the distribution of Sb(V) between adsorbed and solution phases, thereby providing a molecular-level prediction of Sb fate and behavior in chemically complex environments.
The hypothesis-driven research objectives of this project are to (1) determine the mechanisms and thermodynamics of antimony adsorption by hydrous Fe and Al oxyhydroxides (goethite, gibbsite, and kaolinite) as a function of ionic environment, pH, temperature, and antimony concentration; (2) quantify the competitive effects of PO4 and SO4 on antimony adsorption; and (3) develop and evaluate the capability of chemical models to predict antimony adsorption within the holistic framework of a complex chemical environment.
Technical Approach
A series of laboratory-based experiments will be performed to determine the Sb(V) adsorption mechanisms, and the tenacity and reversibility of the adsorption processes. Adsorption edge studies will be used to assess the mechanisms of Sb(V) retention by reactive soil minerals as a function of several environmental variables, including pH, ionic environment, and the presence of competing PO4 and SO4 ligands. Adsorption isotherms will be determined as a function of Sb(V) concentration, pH, ionic environment, and temperature to assess the thermodynamics and reversibility of Sb(V) adsorption. The data accumulated from both these experimental activities, including the identified adsorption mechanisms, will then be used to develop mechanistic prediction models that combine aqueous speciation and surface complexation (adsorption) phenomena. The chemical modeling activity will result in mechanistic parameters that describe Sb(V) retention and that are transferable; they can be used to predict Sb(V) fate and behavior in any soil environment (given that soil chemical information is available).
Benefits
This project will provide an improved understanding of Sb(V) adsorption behavior in soil and develop capabilities to predict Sb(V) mobility and bioavailability. The research results will help establish technically defensible cleanup goals and priorities at DoD facilities. (Anticipated Project Completion - 2013)
Points of Contact
Principal Investigator
Dr. Michael Essington
The University of Tennessee
Phone: 865-974-8819
Fax: 865-974-4514
Document Types
- Fact Sheet - Brief project summary with links to related documents and points of contact.
- Final Report - Comprehensive report for every completed SERDP and ESTCP project that contains all technical results.
- Cost & Performance Report - Overview of ESTCP demonstration activities, results, and conclusions, standardized to facilitate implementation decisions.
- Technical Report - Additional interim reports, laboratory reports, demonstration reports, and technology survey reports.
- Guidance - Instructional information on technical topics such as protocols and user’s guides.
- Workshop Report - Summary of workshop discussion and findings.
- Multimedia - On demand videos, animations, and webcasts highlighting featured initiatives or technologies.
- Model/Software - Computer programs and applications available for download.
- Database - Digitally organized collection of data available to search and access.
