Demonstration of the Attributes of Multi-Increment Sampling and Proper Sample Processing Protocols for the Characterization of Metals on DoD Facilities
ER-200918
Objective
Environmental studies of military training ranges have shown that energetic residues are heterogeneously distributed. To sample military ranges representatively during site or remedial investigation activities, multi-increment sampling strategies have been recommended for the characterization of energetic residues (EPA Method 8330B). Since the release of Method 8330B, a growing concern within the Department of Defense (DoD) and federal and state agencies has been that similar protocols should be adopted for the characterization of metals on training ranges and at other locations. This project will address this data gap and demonstrate the improved data quality that can be achieved by coupling multi-increment sampling with adequate sample processing for determining mass loading of metal constituents on military training ranges. Implementation of this approach will help to guide better environmental stewardship of these essential military resources.
Technology Description
To reduce the influence of compositional and distributional error when estimating the mean concentration of an analyte within a decision unit, Method 8330B recommends collecting 30 or more evenly spaced increments to build a sample with a total sample mass of more than 1 kg. The objective of this sampling technique is to obtain a representative amount of every particle size, composition (e.g., Pb, As, Cu, Cr, Sb, Cd, and Zn), and configuration (e.g., spheres or elongated particles) and to not over-sample or miss any portion of the decision unit. To estimate the total uncertainty for estimating mean concentrations of munitions constituents (MC), replicate multi-increment samples must be collected. If this step is not included in a sampling plan, the total characterization error cannot be determined. To obtain representative subsamples from a field sample, the processing protocol must also address the compositional and distribution heterogeneity. The U.S. Geological Survey recommends that the entire field sample be dried, passed through a #10 (2-mm) sieve, then mechanically pulverized to reduce the particle size to less than 0.15 mm. This step is necessary because, within the less than 2-mm soil size class, particles of MC are present in a variety of sizes, densities, shapes, and compositions. The #10 sieve size encompasses those particles that dissolve more readily and is consistent with the classification of soil and sometimes is used in risk models for human exposure. In this project, multi-increment sampling and adequate sample processing will be demonstrated for the characterization of metals in soils that have been introduced as a consequence of military training activities. Comparisons will be made with existing protocols to evaluate data quality improvements.
Benefits
DoD and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) both have programs tasked with determining if military training and testing facilities present a risk to human health and the environment. In DoD, the Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) and Operational Range Assessment Program (ORAP) are required to perform site investigations. USEPA has become involved in the characterization of energetic residues on military training ranges and the potential for off-site migration through ongoing investigations of the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR). Site characterization plans for firing ranges that can be supported by documented studies and regulatory approved modifications would enhance DoD's ability to satisfy environmental stewardship requirements while maintaining training activities. It is anticipated that cost benefits could range between 50% and 90% depending on the data quality objectives (DQO). (Anticipated Project Completion - 2012)
Project Documents
Points of Contact
Principal Investigator
Mr. Jay Clausen
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC)
Phone: 603-646-4597
Fax: 603-646-4785
Project Documents
Document Types
- Fact Sheet - Brief project summary with links to related documents and points of contact.
- Final Report - Comprehensive report for every completed SERDP and ESTCP project that contains all technical results.
- Cost & Performance Report - Overview of ESTCP demonstration activities, results, and conclusions, standardized to facilitate implementation decisions.
- Technical Report - Additional interim reports, laboratory reports, demonstration reports, and technology survey reports.
- Guidance - Instructional information on technical topics such as protocols and user’s guides.
- Workshop Report - Summary of workshop discussion and findings.
- Multimedia - On demand videos, animations, and webcasts highlighting featured initiatives or technologies.
- Model/Software - Computer programs and applications available for download.
- Database - Digitally organized collection of data available to search and access.
