A Flexible Permeable Reactive Barrier for Protection of Wetland Sediments from Heavy Metals in Runoff Water

ER-201213

Objective

Small arms firing ranges (SAFRs) located on Department of Defense (DoD) facilities are, in many cases, constructed next to wetland areas, including ponds, lakes, and streams. These wetlands, which may be seasonal, intermittent, freshwater, brackish, or estuarine, represent a potential point of regulatory interest as they are at risk of heavy metal contamination in the runoff water from the adjacent active ranges. Access to wetland areas (especially forested wetlands) is typically limited due to a lack of roads. Standard environmental remedial options and monitoring techniques are expensive to implement due to the nature of the terrain and seasonal changes in water flow and salinity. The objective of this project is to demonstrate a relatively low-cost, passive, in situ treatment technology for exclusion of toxic metals in runoff water that can meet the needs of the variable terrain and salinity requirements.

Back to Top

Technology Description

This technology combines the proven use of geotextile fabric woven into a tubular shape (a “sock”) with the addition of innovative amendments to adsorb from surface water cationic (such as lead [Pb], zinc [Zn], and copper [Cu]) and anionic (such as antimony [Sb]) metals, metalloids, and metals bound to suspended solids. The filter sock is National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)-approved for use on construction sites in order to control transport of sediment in surface water. This project will address the contamination of surface receiving waters by metal-contaminated runoff water from training ranges. Several amendments will be evaluated for use in the sock—phosphate minerals and salts, iron and magnesium oxides, and an innovative combination of mesoscale biogenic phosphate carrier and nanoscale reactive chemicals. The latter combination results in a mesoscale material that is easy to handle and recover while retaining nanoscale reactivity for the stabilization of metals. The different geotextiles have varying porosity, photodegradability, and life expectancy that must be matched to the site requirements and the amendments. The weight of a filled sock (approximately 40 lb/linear ft for an 8-inch diameter, depending on the fill material) should effectively prevent sediment migration beneath the sock. Given the large land area to be covered, and the high cost to install and maintain most runoff water management BMPs for metals, the low-cost, easy-to-use filter socks may offer a solution for improving the quality of surface receiving waters located adjacent to training ranges.

Back to Top

Benefits

The expected benefits to DoD include a reduced potential for impact on surface receiving waters. It is estimated that there are more than 3000 active SAFRs at DoD facilities in the United States used for both military training and recreational purposes. The principal life-cycle cost advantage of the technology is that it could be rapidly installed in areas (i.e., watersheds) that could be impacted by sediment runoff containing metals. Once the lifetime of the filter sock has been reached, the fill material can be removed, properly disposed of, and replaced if necessary. There is the potential that the sand with the proper amendments will pass the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) evaluation and the material can be disposed of in a nonhazardous waste landfill or left in place, significantly reducing disposal costs. Combining the filter sock geotextile with amendments for metal immobilization creates a containment system for metals, metalloids, and metals bound to suspended solids found in surface water runoff from training ranges that is flexible, transportable, inexpensive, and easy to replace. (Anticipated Project Completion - 2015)

Back to Top

Points of Contact

Principal Investigator

Dr. Steven Larson

U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC)

Phone: 601-634-3431

Fax: 601-634-2742

Program Manager

Environmental Restoration

SERDP and ESTCP

Document Types

  • Fact Sheet - Brief project summary with links to related documents and points of contact.
  • Final Report - Comprehensive report for every completed SERDP and ESTCP project that contains all technical results.
  • Cost & Performance Report - Overview of ESTCP demonstration activities, results, and conclusions, standardized to facilitate implementation decisions.
  • Technical Report - Additional interim reports, laboratory reports, demonstration reports, and technology survey reports.
  • Guidance - Instructional information on technical topics such as protocols and user’s guides.
  • Workshop Report - Summary of workshop discussion and findings.
  • Multimedia - On demand videos, animations, and webcasts highlighting featured initiatives or technologies.
  • Model/Software - Computer programs and applications available for download.
  • Database - Digitally organized collection of data available to search and access.