Use of Target Shape and Size in Classification of UXO in Survey Data

MR-1455

Objective

MR-1455 Project Graphic

To classify UXO in survey data, an inductive learning method called ensembles will be used in conjunction with neural networks. The ensembles combine the output of many separate predictors.

Conducting unexploded ordnance (UXO) surveys using Global Positioning System (GPS)-guided geophysical mapping techniques is rapidly becoming the industry standard. Despite the investment in creating improved data, the use of physics-based signature analysis algorithms, and analyses employing both magnetometry and electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors, clearing UXO ranges invariably requires digging 5-100 items for every recovered intact ordnance. In the recently completed SERDP SEED project MR-1354, the project team investigated several machine learning approaches to automate the analysis process and develop classification approaches based on the physical predictions of the dipole fitting routines used in analyzing magnetometry data. These included Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Genetic Ensemble Feature Selection (GEFS) approaches, trained on ground-truthed magnetometry survey data to analyze and classify blind data. In each case, the machine learning approaches gave inferior results to those of a human analyst interactively analyzing targets using dipole fitting routines and visual cues to make classification predictions. Researchers turned to resampling the raw data arrays, using a machine learning approach to select candidate targets, then analyzing those targets applying shape function information and shape filters resident in an existing commercial software product, Feature Analyst. Working with vehicular Multi-Sensor Towed Array Detection System (MTADS) survey data from a ground artillery range, this approach dramatically reduced the false alarm rate over that of the human analyst. This analysis, designed to reduce false positives, unfortunately also mildly increased the false negative rate.

The objective of this project is to develop a more sophisticated automated screening approach (i.e., target picker) that increases the inclusion of all viable UXO candidates, while continuing to reject non-UXO. Specific objectives include: (1) further evolve the characterization of size and shape parameters for use by the pattern recognition algorithms, (2) develop a probabilistic-based ranking system that can be adjusted to either maximize clutter rejection or to reduce false negatives, and (3) investigate the fusion of physics-based and size- and shape-based parameters.

Back to Top

Technical Approach

This project will investigate applications of the sophisticated automated screening approach for UXO classification to other types of magnetometry data, including airborne and marine data sets. Researchers will consider other types of mapping approaches (gradiometric and analytic signal) to generate images containing shape information for pattern recognition algorithms. Other sensor data sets will include EMI data (single or multiple time gates, or frequency-domain data). Range data of varying complexity in terms of target density, ordnance types, and geologically difficult terrain will be evaluated.

Back to Top

Benefits

The benefits of this approach include automation of the target analysis process to the extent possible and improvements in the ability to reject clutter targets in UXO cleanup, while retaining the ability to capture intact ordnance. It is likely that the greatest successes from this project will be realized by combining the approaches developed in this effort with the use of physics-based algorithm classification in some type of cooperative analysis approach. It is unlikely that an ultimate best analysis approach will be accomplished without the provision for a human analyst in the process (at least to evaluate quality assurance).

Back to Top

Points of Contact

Principal Investigator

Dr. Jim McDonald

U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

Phone: 202-767-3340

Fax: 202-404-8119

Program Manager

Munitions Response

SERDP and ESTCP

Document Types

  • Fact Sheet - Brief project summary with links to related documents and points of contact.
  • Final Report - Comprehensive report for every completed SERDP and ESTCP project that contains all technical results.
  • Cost & Performance Report - Overview of ESTCP demonstration activities, results, and conclusions, standardized to facilitate implementation decisions.
  • Technical Report - Additional interim reports, laboratory reports, demonstration reports, and technology survey reports.
  • Guidance - Instructional information on technical topics such as protocols and user’s guides.
  • Workshop Report - Summary of workshop discussion and findings.
  • Multimedia - On demand videos, animations, and webcasts highlighting featured initiatives or technologies.
  • Model/Software - Computer programs and applications available for download.
  • Database - Digitally organized collection of data available to search and access.