Developing an Efficient and Cost-Effective Ground-Penetrating Radar Field Methodology for Subsurface Exploration and Mapping of Cultural Resources on Public Lands
RC-1261
Objective
Construction of the Hammer test bed. In this sandy soil area mostly objects were laid in the ground and covered with homogeneous sandy silt.
A large number of archaeological sites are often discovered to be buried below soil and sediments only after construction activities, such as road building, pipeline burial, or other below-ground intrusion, have commenced. This leads to costly construction delays as compliance with regulations regarding cultural resources are met. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has recently proven to be efficient at producing three-dimensional images of buried cultural features when information about the nature of radar reflections can be determined. The success of GPR surveys is to a great extent dependent on soil and sediment mineralogy, clay content, ground moisture, depth of burial, surface topography, and vegetation. Although GPR is not a geophysical method that can be immediately applied to any geographic or archaeological setting, with thoughtful modifications in acquisition and data processing methodology, GPR can be adapted to many differing site conditions; however, the GPR signature for most archaeological features has not yet been estimated.
The objective of this project was to quantify and calibrate GPR for known archaeological features that are commonly found in many areas of the United States. A field and laboratory protocol that can be modified using specific site conditions and the extent of the target features (i.e., depth and aerial) was produced. A desired end result was to facilitate more accurate and efficient detection and mapping of buried cultural remains on Department of Defense installations and ranges and other managed lands, decreasing the reliance on traditional, arbitrary excavations that are both costly and destructive.
Technical Approach
The large trash midden and a small burial pit at Hammer before burial. The midden pile contained wood, organic material and also metal objects. The burial pit was made to simulate an earth oven, but it was not actually burned. It was filled with material that was wood, metal and plastic, which was of a different composition than the back-fill materials.
This project analyzed GPR data in detail at two test sites (one in Washington and one in Illinois) where subsurface conditions were known in advance and environmental variables such as soil moisture and composition were measured and then modeled. Many radar configurations, including different frequency surface antennas, transect spacing, depth of investigation, and filtering types, were used to collect the data. The stratigraphic framework, constructed from what was known about these test sites, enabled calibration of the GPR signal in a variety of common archaeological earth materials as never before. Field and laboratory data were modeled on the computer and reflection simulations compared and then adjusted in an iterative fashion to mimic and understand real-world conditions. Computer programs were developed and integrated for the efficient and accurate mapping of buried sites.
Benefits
This project developed and refined the use of GPR technology in archaeology to the extent that the results will be central to the design and implementation of future GPR studies in cultural resource assessment. The results include a pre-data acquisition protocol for site analysis, which will enable researchers to predict conditions expected in the field and to adjust hardware and software configurations accordingly. Site analysis of this sort will promote an understanding of GPR energy radiation and reflection in the ground, which in turn will save money and time as conditions can be predicted and adjusted in advance. (Project Completed - 2006)
Project Documents
Symposium & Workshop
FY 2013 New Start Project Selections
Points of Contact
Principal Investigator
Dr. Lawrence Conyers
University of Denver
Phone: 303-871-2684
Fax: 303-871-2437
Program Manager
Resource Conservation and Climate Change
SERDP and ESTCP
Project Documents
Document Types
- Fact Sheet - Brief project summary with links to related documents and points of contact.
- Final Report - Comprehensive report for every completed SERDP and ESTCP project that contains all technical results.
- Cost & Performance Report - Overview of ESTCP demonstration activities, results, and conclusions, standardized to facilitate implementation decisions.
- Technical Report - Additional interim reports, laboratory reports, demonstration reports, and technology survey reports.
- Guidance - Instructional information on technical topics such as protocols and user’s guides.
- Workshop Report - Summary of workshop discussion and findings.
- Multimedia - On demand videos, animations, and webcasts highlighting featured initiatives or technologies.
- Model/Software - Computer programs and applications available for download.
- Database - Digitally organized collection of data available to search and access.
Featured Initiatives
The latest developments in science, engineering, and technology.
