Managing Declining Pine Stands for the Restoration of Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Habitat

RC-1474

Objective

RC-1474 Project Graphic

Longleaf pine seedlings established in a natural gap.

Defense (DoD) land managers are challenged to restore longleaf pine (LLP) forests to support red-cockaded woodpeckers (RCW) and associated species of concern, while retaining critical habitat features (e.g., mature trees). Specifically, managers need protocols to restore LLP on sites where it is necessary to retain some non-LLP canopy pines. At Fort Benning, Georgia, as many as 70% of the active RCW cavities are located in mature loblolly pine (LBP) stands with trees that are being lost at an alarming rate. Premature tree deaths and general loss of vigor are described as "loblolly decline" and have been associated with a variety of potential stressors, including disease, environmental conditions, and management activities. Because such stressors are not uniformly distributed on landscapes, managers need models to help predict which stands are most vulnerable to decline. Further, managers need guidance for selecting individual trees for removal.

The objective of this project is to develop protocols for restoring LLP to stands currently occupied by declining LBP, while retaining a canopy component.

Back to Top

Technical Approach

Field experiments needed to develop regeneration protocols will be installed at both Fort Benning, Georgia, and at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. These sites represent distinct environmental conditions where LBP occupies historically LLP sites. Establishing the same experiment at two different sites will provide information needed to extrapolate findings across the range of DoD installations in the region. In each location, the experiment will be set up as a randomized split plot design replicated on blocks with canopy treatments as the main plot factor and cultural treatments as the split plot factor. Experimental response variables include the survival and growth of residual trees, seedlings, and planted native grasses; light; soil nutrients and moisture; foliar nutrients; and seedling water potential. Stand vulnerability and the individual tree mortality models will be based on existing inventory data and on data collected from a stratified sample of all upland LBP stands on Fort Benning. Standard ANOVA, regression, and non-parametric methods will be used for most analyses; dendrochronology methods coupled with logistic regression and time series analysis will be used to forecast tree mortality. The stand vulnerability model will be applied at Camp Lejeune to identify sites most vulnerable to pine decline, a condition not yet reported on the installation but present in the Atlantic coastal plain region.

Back to Top

Benefits

Results from this project will demonstrate the effect of management alternatives on LLP restoration and the quality of RCW habitat. Ultimately, the results will be used by land managers to guide LLP restoration under partial LBP canopies. The results also will feed into planning and landscape models to predict the broad consequences of stand management options. Combining results from two locations should provide a framework for restoring LLP on a range of conditions at other DoD installations. Applying information on stand vulnerability and tree mortality to management decisions has the potential to maximize RCW habitat conservation through the forest transition to longleaf pine, helping DoD meet its endangered species recovery responsibilities as well as its training mission requirements. (Anticipated Project Completion - 2011)

Back to Top

Symposium & Workshop

Points of Contact

Principal Investigator

Dr. Joan Walker

USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station

Phone: 864-656-4822

Fax: 864-656-1407

Program Manager

Resource Conservation and Climate Change

SERDP and ESTCP

Document Types

  • Fact Sheet - Brief project summary with links to related documents and points of contact.
  • Final Report - Comprehensive report for every completed SERDP and ESTCP project that contains all technical results.
  • Cost & Performance Report - Overview of ESTCP demonstration activities, results, and conclusions, standardized to facilitate implementation decisions.
  • Technical Report - Additional interim reports, laboratory reports, demonstration reports, and technology survey reports.
  • Guidance - Instructional information on technical topics such as protocols and user’s guides.
  • Workshop Report - Summary of workshop discussion and findings.
  • Multimedia - On demand videos, animations, and webcasts highlighting featured initiatives or technologies.
  • Model/Software - Computer programs and applications available for download.
  • Database - Digitally organized collection of data available to search and access.

Tools and Training

Put innovative research and technologies to work.

Access Tools & Training